Thursday, December 8, 2011

Between Two Cities


Lately I have been thinking a lot about duality. We Christians traditionally believe in another realm beyond the one we can see, touch and taste, and that this is where our true home lies. That we are just pilgrims in the world of sensory experience. Augustine, that ardent and tormented saint whose sexuality was a perennial barrier to his communion with God, calls these two realities the City of God and the City of Man. In mainstream America, Augustine's dualistic assessment of humankind is unpopular. Even many Christians, not to mention the agnostics, atheists, Buddhist practitioners and "spiritual-but-not-religious," cringe upon reading:
I classify the human race into two branches: the one consists of those who live by human standards, the other of those who live according to God's will.... By two cities I mean to say two societies of human beings, one of which is predestined to reign with God for all eternity, the other doomed to undergo eternal punishment with the Devil (Ch 5.1).

Many would ask: How can it be fair to separate the human race into two branches, when we are all such a mix of good and evil? When those who do evil have so often been wounded by circumstance? When the very definition of "evil" is relative? When some "evils" seem predicated on maintaining control over others, and some "evils" deny the pleasures our bodies and hearts were designed to experience? Some might insist that they would rather live in the City of Humans if the City of God thunders with such judgment.


But if we examine the qualities that Augustine assigns to the two realms, we might appreciate the freight behind his severe eschatological pronouncement. Some of Augustine's descriptions of the earthly city sound just like fashionable social justice advocates of today: "Remove justice, and what are kingdoms but gangs of criminals on a large scale?" (Ch. 4.4). He asserts that those rulers who belong to the heavenly kingdom, in contrast, "are not inflated with pride, but remember that they are but men...more than their earthly kingdom, they love that realm where they do not fear to share the kingship...they grant pardon not to allow impunity to wrong-doing but in hope of amendment of the wrong-doer" (Ch. 5.24). The point is that we must orient ourselves toward a transcendent standard of justice and goodness, rather than letting our own perceptions, desires and goals—short-sighted and destructive as they inevitably will be—guide our lives. Yes, humans often achieve some measure of concrete beauty and fulfillment through their "love of self." Yet Augustine reminds us that even in the in the "grandeur of empire... The only joy to be attained had the fragile brilliance of glass, a joy outweighed by the fear that it may be shattered in a moment" (Ch. 4.3). The Buddhist initiates on their meditation cushions, trying to understand what it means to detach from desire and be present to the moment, could relate.

Augustine recognizes that we cannot hope to distinguish between the two cities during this life; they are inextricably mingled. But I have to wonder, with my much more ambiguous beliefs about salvation and eternity, whether these two realms are also inextricably mixed within each individual. Can the macrocosm contain what the microcosm does not? Perhaps those who seem most damned to perish in the City of Humans are really just pieces of those who seem most heavenly. Then not a single one of us could be excluded from building the City of God; we all depend on each other to realize salvation, whether we are weak or steadfast, pious or reckless.

At an evening church service in the gritty heart of Atlanta, down the street from an outreach center for the homeless, I sit down next to a tall, willow-thin man who just got out of jail three days ago. It is his first time at the church, but he somehow ends up serving communion. For all I could tell, he inadvertently volunteered himself by rushing so eagerly up front after the officiant invited everyone to the table. A five-year-old girl in a wheelchair who also has willow-thin limbs serves me the bread, and the ex-convict serves me the wine. They both blurt out their lines awkwardly—"The body of Christ," "The cup of salvation,"—as if they are not quite sure what they mean. But are any of us sure? After all, communion is by definition a Holy Mystery.

At a sleepy bar on a weeknight in the hipster district of Little Five Points, I watch a girl dance across the empty floor in spandex and sneakers. She moves to the DJ's funk music with striking elegance. Her head is turned down and her shaggy hair hangs in her eyes as her body slithers like a snake and spins effortlessly. She is not trying to impress anyone around her. She seems rather to be dancing for someone invisible and intangible hovering above her. She might be high on drugs. Then, drugs have always been a way people seek transcendent truth, albeit a blind and destructive one as typically used today, outside the containers of ritual and tradition. Whether she realizes it or not, she is trying to dwell in the City of God.

These stories from an everyday city reflect my ambiguous relationship to the two cosmic Cities. I struggle to discern what truly constitutes a spiritual path, and how to know if I am on it. My bouts of apathetic depression, during which I am prone to forget God entirely, sometimes lead me back to humble reliance on the sustenance of spiritual community. Conversely, my proclaimed passion for doing the work of the Lord tends to get tangled up with my childish drive for affirmation from others. I find myself, as ever, caught in the margins. Which city do I live in? Do I have to chose?

I climbed under my covers one night and prayed for God to illuminate the meaning of the two cities in my life. What I got was a story about a karaoke bar and a church service. I was attending an epic talent show and fundraiser at a church. I was laden with a sense of responsibility for the event, though my role seemed to be nothing more than walking around from person to person and looking busy. My extended family was all there, and lots of shiny-faced church members.

But I really wanted to be in a bar across from the church where a good friend of mine was hosting karaoke. He was a dedicated Christian who greatly outpaced me in his passion to serve the marginalized; he was also a prolific smoker, drinker, reveler and self-absorbed navel-gazer. I had decided that I was in love with him. I was willing to stay up scandalously late so that I could go over to his karaoke night after the church event ended. He had said he wanted my support. And I wanted to impress him with my own self-absorbed charms as I belted out smoky Aretha Franklin songs.

The church event dragged on as if it were its own revelrous party. As 2:00 AM came and went, I was texting back and forth with my friend—texting on a cell phone! A sure sign that I had let go of all my moral principles!—and apologizing that I wasn't there yet. Could I stay up until 3:00? 3:30? Would this be a blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? The talent show finally finished and I hurried across the courtyard outside. Inside the bar, they were already taking down the speakers and the rest of the karaoke equipment. My friend was nowhere in sight. But what kind of bar was this? It had pews and a big stage just like in a church. My family members and shiny-faced church members were there as well. Balding men in polo shirts were carrying the sound system and smiling their fatherly Christian smiles. Even the smallest children didn't seem worried about going to sleep at an ungodly hour.

"Where did the karaoke host go?" I asked someone.

"Oh, he hasn't left yet," they assured me. "He's just changing in the bedrooms."

The bedrooms, of course. I lived in this bar with my family. We slept in the bedrooms in back. Somehow it had become impossible to separate wholesome havens of family values from seedy karaoke bars, or to disentangle working like a bee in the Body of Christ from falling in love with charismatic bastards. The darkness around us is thick and rich, and we may have to learn to make something out of it rather than trying to float above it. We are just pilgrims here, but we are also trying to come on up to the house. We are trying to make a real home for ourselves out of our fragmented insights into the heavenly city. If we do not practice home-making in this life, how will we recognize our home in the next?

2 comments:

  1. I really needed to read this. Actually, I really needed to read it when I first saw it a while back, and then I really needed to read it when I read it again today... Just another example of some fragmented home-making! These thoughts and interpretations and personal stories weave through each other to make a vivid picture of our in-between-cities dilemma. I will probably need to read this again.

    Oh! And that's one of the best music videos I've ever seen!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Isn't that music video dizzying? What if we need to make our homes our very bodies? How difficult, when we are so involved in abstractions (like words)! Can we write them into our bodies? And break down the false dichotomy between ideas and the breathing presence of our bodies?

    ReplyDelete